CONSULTING ACCOUNTANTS . TAXATION SPECIALISTS . BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT PHONE +61 7 3012 9580

taxInsight - ARTICLES

2016/02 - March

Print Friendly and PDF

Allocation of Franking Credits by Trustees

Published on 24 Feb 2016

A recent Federal Court decision has made it abundantly clear that franking credits must be allocated to beneficiaries in the same proportion as the relevant dividends.

The trustee of the Thomas Investment Trust had resolved to distribute the net income in proportions to an individual and a company. In a second resolution it resolved to distribute the franking credits in different proportions.

The trustee then sought and obtained directions from the Supreme Court of Queensland that franking credits were to be dealt with by the trustee and could be distributed to beneficiaries in accord with those trustee resolutions.

However in a later hearing the superior Federal Court decided that the Supreme Court orders could not operate to deprive the Taxation Commissioner of a right to make submissions on all questions of fact and law. Hence the Federal Court had to form its own conclusions.

The Federal Court further held that as neither “income” nor “net income” were defined in the Trust Deed they did not refer to assessable income under the tax acts (what is known as Section 95 net income).

Next the Federal Court held that franking credits were not “ordinary income.” They were not dividends or income under the trust deed and could not be streamed to particular beneficiaries. Hence a trustee resolution to allocate franking credits in different proportions to the franked dividends were not effective.

Thomas v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (2015 ATC 20-526)

 

Andrew and Tony Lovett

22 February 2016

Disclaimer: The information contained in this publication is for guidance only and we believe it is correct at the time of publishing. It should not be relied upon without obtaining professional advice regarding your circumstances. No responsibility for loss occasioned directly or indirectly to any person acting or refraining from acting wholly or partially upon or as a result of the material in this online publication or for any error in or omission from or external broken links within this online publication can be accepted by the publisher or any author, editor, contributor or consultant of any company referred to herein.

© Copyright Andrew and Tony Lovett - All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be republished in any form or by any means, electronic, photocopying, recording or otherwise without written permission.